Skip to content

docs: fix wrong description of software_dsp example

Philipp Jungkamp requested to merge PJungkamp/wireplumber:patch-1 into master

As I understand WirePlumber's rule matching, the different entries of the matches array are combined using a logical OR while the matching of different keys within one object corresponds to a logical AND.

I think that the description below the example for Software DSP filters gets this wrong and implies a logical AND between both matching rule objects.

Merge request reports

Loading